Page 70 of 76
Evidence from trials do not support firm
conclusions of effectiveness.
Savours and Koehane, 2019
Highly relevant to this theme and review.
Mixed methods literature review, rather
than a systematic review. There may be
bias in study selection and conclusions
drawn from findings from the literature
selected.
Cooper Gibson Research, 2018
Highly relevant to this theme and review.
Desk based, mixed methods literature
review with interviews. There may be
bias in study selection and conclusions
drawn from findings from the literature
selected.
Quality assessment checklist based on study design
Four overarching questions that were answered dependent on study design as detailed
below this box.
1. Is the nature and extent of the claim relevant to your
review?
Yes
No
Partly
Unclear
2. Is the evidence claim trustworthy in using a relevant
method to achieve that evidence claim?
Yes
No
Partly
Unclear
3. Is the evidence claim relevant in terms of how its focus
(how it applied the method such as for e.g. questions asked,
outcome measures etc) to address the study question and
make the claim?
Yes
No
Partly
Unclear